Legal Opinion
Amdahl v. Stonewall Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 12, 1992No. CX-91-2074PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
In a discretionary appeal, an insurer challenges the trial court’s denial of its motion to dismiss this suit as untimely under the statute of limitations and for insufficient service of process. We affirm.
FACTS
John McGuire and Cheryl Wilebski sued C & L Restaurant for injuries sustained when an intoxicated motorist, to whom C & L served liquor, struck the motorcycle they were riding. Stonewall Insurance Company, C & L’s liquor liability insurer, defended C & L in the consolidated action. The jury returned a verdict of $4,349,000, which exceeded the policy’s liability…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Jenkins v. J. C. Penney Casualty Ins.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Roldan v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Purdy v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Leek v. American Express Property CasualtyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Semler v. KlangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Brennan v. Western National Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.