Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS G. FORSBERG, Judge *
Appellant A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc., contends that the district court erred in denying its motion to vacate the default judgment because the district court lacked jurisdiction, since respondent David J. Tu-rek failed to effectively serve appellant pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 4.05. Because the rule unambiguously states service is effected when the acknowledgment is received within the period allowed by the rules, we reverse.
FACTS
Respondent David J. Turek was terminated from his employment with appellant A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc. (A.S.P.) in October 1994. In…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Berryhill v. SeppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Charles Douglas Gulley, Jr. Elizabeth Gulley v. The Mayo FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Semler v. KlangDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Medalen v. Tiger Drylac U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Roehrdanz v. BrillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Hornberger v. WendelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Van Note v. 2007 Pontiac, VIN 1G2ZH58N574139187Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.