Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Lund
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 28, 1999No. C7-99-431PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellants attempted to bring suit in district court for uninsured motorist benefits for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident. The district court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that the six-year statute of limitations had run on appellants’ claim for uninsured motorist coverage. Appellants argue the district court erred because (1) the statute of limitations does not begin to run until arbitration has been demanded and rejected by respondent, and (2) respondent is estopped from asserting a statute of limitations defense because of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Entzion v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Community Partners Designs, Inc. v. City of LonsdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Fedie v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- In Re the Welfare of T.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001