Legal Opinion

Richardson v. City of Redondo Beach

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1933No. Docket No. 4723PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

In this appeal we are unfortunate in not having the assistance of a brief on behalf of respondents, the record before us consisting of the clerk’s transcript of some 125 pages, a reporter’s transcript on appeal consisting of approximately 450 pages, and a brief by the appellants Kranz and Municipal Bonding Company only. A record of such size presenting technical questions of engineering and intricate problems of law should not be thus lightly cast upon the court. An issue presented to a court justifies the co-operation of both court and counsel. We have endeavored, however, to acquaint…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Rutledge v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Appeal of S. O. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Lambert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Belser v. HoffschneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jenner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Maxwell v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Baroldi v. DenniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Raisch v. Sanitary Dist. No. 1 of Marin CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API