Richardson v. City of Redondo Beach
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
In this appeal we are unfortunate in not having the assistance of a brief on behalf of respondents, the record before us consisting of the clerk’s transcript of some 125 pages, a reporter’s transcript on appeal consisting of approximately 450 pages, and a brief by the appellants Kranz and Municipal Bonding Company only. A record of such size presenting technical questions of engineering and intricate problems of law should not be thus lightly cast upon the court. An issue presented to a court justifies the co-operation of both court and counsel. We have endeavored, however, to acquaint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Rutledge v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Appeal of S. O. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Lambert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Belser v. HoffschneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jenner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Maxwell v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Baroldi v. DenniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Raisch v. Sanitary Dist. No. 1 of Marin CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952