Legal Opinion
Jenner v. City Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 22, 1958No. Civ. 22955PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
Plaintiffs, property owners in the district, attack (1) the proceedings taken by the city of Covina under the Vehicle Parking District Law, as amended (Sts. & Hy. Code, § 31500 et seq.), for the formation of Vehicle Parking District Number 1 of said city, (2) the apportionment of the assessment to cover the cost and expenses of the improvements, and (3) the validity of certain sections of the Streets and Highways Code. More specifically, they seek to enjoin the sale of bonds upon the properties within the assessment district from which funds the project will be financed. Having been denied…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Thompson v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Suckow v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- General Motors Corp. v. State of Illinois Motor Vehicle Review BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Lemelle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.