Belser v. Hoffschneider
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This action was .brought to foreclose a lien for a street assessment upon a district made by the *456city council of Oakland, and declared to be benefited by the street work. The work consisted in the construction of certain sewers, which apparently were to constitute a sewerage system for the district defined.
The court found that the contract for the work was duly let, entered into, and the work performed by the contractor according to the contract, and was approved and accepted by the street superintendent. That a diagram was made and approved as required, and that after the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robinson v. Bd. of Supervisors of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Emery v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Dorsey v. Barry.California Supreme Court · 1864
- Keys v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- People ex rel. Fries v. Supervisors of Marin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1858
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. California-Arizona Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Lambert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Stanwood v. CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.