Legal Opinion
Speight v. Fulwood
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 25, 2011No. Civil Action 10-1777 (JDB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
In this action for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, petitioner, an inmate at the District of Columbia Jail, claims that the United States Parole Commission (“USPC”) has unlawfully detained him beyond the expiration date of his sentence. 1 In response, the USPC, which oversees parole determinations of District of Columbia prisoners, claims that petitioner “has failed to account for the forfeiture of the time he spent on parole ... each time his parole [was] revoked.” United States Parole Commission’s Opposition to Petitioner’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robert L. Williams v. Leo C. HillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Anthony J. Lobue v. Warren Christopher, Secretary, U.S. Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Matthew Noble v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Speight v. JohnstonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Speight-Bey v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021