Legal Opinion
Robert L. Williams v. Leo C. Hill
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 6, 1996No. 95-5119PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed PER CURIAM.
ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE
2Per curiam
After Robert L. Williams was convicted of bank fraud and witness tampering, he sued the two prosecutors, a Secret Service agent, three of his court-appointed attorneys, the probation officer who apparently prepared his presentence report, the court reporter who prepared the transcripts of his trial, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of the Treasury. These individuals, Williams alleged in his pro se complaint, conspired to violate his Fourth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment rights and committed criminal offenses.…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harry Kenneth Clark v. Library of CongressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Wilton Chatman-Bey v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by112 opinions
- Gerald W. Clemente v. Troy AllenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Ruff v. RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Christopher John MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark W. SIAS, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Lora-Pena v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- White v. United States Probation OfficeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.