Legal Opinion
Hewes v. Germain Fruit Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1895No. 19535PublishedCited by 19 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
This action was brought to recover damages, laid at $1,200, for an alleged breach by the defendant, a corporation, of the following contract:
“ Tustin, Oct. 29, ’86.
“ Agreement between David Hewes and Germain Fruit Co., whereby said David Hewes sells and Germain Fruit Co. buys the crop of raisins owned by said D. Hewes (eight to ten thousand boxes, more or less, said raisins being his entire crop of this season, say 5,000 boxes in warehouse, balance on ground being cured), at one and dollars per box, packed and delivered—raisins now uncured to be cured and delivered at packing-house…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Dana v. . FiedlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
3Cited by19 opinions
- Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Sackett v. SpindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Rayfield v. Van MeterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Gopcevic v. California Packing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.