Legal Opinion

Hougham v. Rowland

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1939No. Civ. 2255PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Appellant was a wholesale used car dealer, and respondent a retail used car dealer at the time of the instant transaction. In April, 1938, respondent purchased 16 vehicles for resale upon his used car lot. Appellant delivered the cars but retained the certificates of ownership. Respondent maintains that the certificates were retained pursuant to an oral conditional sale agreement. On June 9,1938, respondent returned to the place of business of appellant four of said vehicles, and asked that he be given credit upon his account for the sum stated in the account for which he had agreed to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parke v. FranciscusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Rayfield v. Van MeterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Rauer v. RyndCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Bice v. Harold L. Arnold, IncorporatedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bowden v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Garfinkle v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Investors Royalty Co., Inc. v. Market Trend Survey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  4. Lencioni v. DanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Commercial & Farmers National Bank v. HetrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API