Eads v. Kessler
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a motion to discharge an attachment. M. T. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from an ,'order of the court below denying a motion to discharge an attachment. The motion was based solely upon the ground that the respondent had a lien for the payment of the money sued for in the action, and that therefore the attachment was improperly issued.
The facts are these: On the 28th of December, 1895, the parties entered into an executory written contract by which the respondent agreed to sell, and the appellant agreed to buy, a two-fifths interest in certain patent rights, described in certain letters patent set forth in the contract. The price was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Conrad v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bowden v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Hougham v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Standard Auto Sales Co. v. LehmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Katzenbach & Bullock Co. v. BreslauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Bank of Yolo v. Bank of WoodlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.