Hilmer v. Hills
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
This is an action to recover $3,565 damages for the alleged unlawful conversion of a carload of butter and eggs. On a trial before the court without a jury the findings and judgment were in favor of defendants. The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment and from an order denying them a new trial.
Appellants attack the finding of the court to the effect that the plaintiff was not the owner of the goods in question and' was not entitled to the possession thereof. The facts are not in dispute but the question is, Do these facts show a sale of, the goods so far executed as to pass the title…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Empire State Type Founding Co. v. GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Strauss, Pritz & Co. v. S. Hirsch & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- Cardinell v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Johnson-Brinkman Commission Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Carvell v. WeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Masoner v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- In re LiebigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Brinkley-Douglas Fruit Co. v. SilmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- George F. Hinrichs, Inc. v. Standard Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.