Legal Opinion
In Re Ellis
California Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1938No. Crim. 4157PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The petitioner seeks her release from custody in this proceeding in habeas corpus. She was charged and convicted of keeping bees on her home place in the city of Los Angeles contrary to the provisions of a city ordinance. She attacks the constitutionality of the ordinance.
The facts are stipulated. The petitioner owns five lots contiguous to her home at 4041% Sequoia Street in the city of Los Angeles. The lots have a frontage of fifty feet each on Sequoia Street and a depth of 147.68. They abut upon lots of similar size which are improved with residences. The lots owned by the petitioner as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Reinman v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Pacific Palisades Ass'n v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Ex Parte HadacheckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Browne v. County of TehamaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- In Re Air Crash Disaster Near Saigon, Etc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- In Re JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.