Legal Opinion
Genzyme Corp. v. ATRIUM MEDICAL CORP.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 22, 2004No. CIV.A.00-958-MPTPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In July 2002, this court issued a claim construction opinion following a Markman hearing 1 held in May 2002. In November 2002, a trial was held on the patent infringement dispute between Genzyme and Atrium regarding pulmonary drainage devices. Genzyme alleged damages caused by the marketing and sale of Atrium’s “OASIS” and “EXPRESS” devices, which allegedly infringed Genzyme’s “Elliot patents” (U.S. Patent Nos. 4,544,370; 4,715,-856; 4,747,844 and 4,822,346) and its “D’Antonio patent” (U.S. Patent No. 4,899,531). Both…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robert Bosch, LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Express Mobile, Inc. v. GoDaddy.com, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
- Liqwd, Inc. v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- TrackTime, LLC v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024