Legal Opinion
Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Cordis Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 15, 2006No. CIV. 03-283-SLRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBINSON, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Scimed, Incorporated (collectively “BSC”) filed this action against defendants Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson, Incorporated (collectively “Cordis”) alleging, inter alia, that Cordis’ Cypher stent infringes claim 8 of U.S. Patent No. 6,120,536 (“the ’536 patent”). (D.I.l)
A jury trial was held on this matter from June 21, 2005 to July 1, 2005. The jury entered a verdict on July 1, 2005, finding that BSC had shown by a preponderance of evidence that the Cypher stent…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Cordis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Laymon v. Lobby House, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Laboratory Skin Care, Inc. v. Limited Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Mobilemedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Chervon (HK) Limited v. One World Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.