Legal Opinion

Air Turbine Technology, Inc. v. Atlas Copco AB

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided September 23, 2003No. 01-8288-CIVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARRA, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment regarding breach of confidential relationship and fraud claims [DE 91], Defendants’ Motion to Partially Dismiss Plaintiffs Lanham Act and Florida Unfair Competition Claims Under Rule 12(b)(1) [DE 245] and Defendants’ Consolidated Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 250]. The Court has carefully considered the motions, responses, replies, and the arguments of counsel made at a hearing before the undersigned on September 11, 2003, and is otherwise…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Air Turbine Technology, Inc. v. Atlas Copco Ab, Atlas Copco Tools Ab, Atlas Copco North America, Inc., and Atlas Copco Tools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Air Turbine Technology v. Atlas Copco AbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. Star-Brite Distributing, Inc. v. Kop-Coat, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
  4. American Family Care Inc v. Medhelp PCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API