Legal Opinion
Wheatley v. San Pedro, L.A. & Salt Lake R.R.
California Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1915No. L.A. No. 3299PublishedCited by 19 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. S. Halsted, W. F. Palmer, Wilfred M. Peck, and F. A. Waters, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This cause having been transferred to the district court of appeal for the second district, that court, upon an opinion by Mr. Justice James, affirmed the judgment and order appealed from. The cause was then transferred to this court for rehearing. Upon further consideration, we adhere to the decision of the district court and adopt its opinion, which is as follows:
"Action to quiet title to certain lands. From the judgment in favor of plaintiff, and an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, appeals were taken.
"The lands as to the title to which controversy is made are lands lying…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Turner v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Owsley v. MatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Helm v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Trimble v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1815
- White v. BurnleySupreme Court of the United States · 1858
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Youngstown Steel Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Niles v. Louis H. Rapoport & Sons, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Kesler v. EllisIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- City of Los Angeles v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake R.R.California Supreme Court · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.