Legal Opinion

Kesler v. Ellis

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1929No. 5164PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarian, J.

This is an action to quiet title and involves a disputed boundary. The parties are coterminous owners of lands situate in section 26, township 9 south, range 42, E'. B. M., in Caribou county. Plaintiff (appellant) brought this action to quiet title to the following land, situate in Caribou county, to wit: All that portion of the south half of the northwest quarter and the west half of the northeast quarter of section 26, township 9 south, range 42 east of the Boise Meridian, “lying and being between the south line of said premises and a certain fence erected thereon and north of said south…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miller v. Mills CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Price v. De ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lehman v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  4. O'Malley v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Ivey v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Beneficial Life Ins. Co. v. WakamatsuIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Edgeller v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Trappett v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Mulder v. StandsIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Lisher v. KrasseltIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API