Youngstown Steel Products Co. v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
This action was brought to compel the defendants to raise certain power lines and to obtain a declaration of the rights of the parties under an instrument granting to the city the right to maintain the wires above plaintiff’s land. The grant gives the city a right of way across the land “with the right to erect and maintain poles with all necessary wires and fixtures thereon, and to keep same free from foliage . . . [and to] have access to said right of way . . . for purposes of repairs. ...” The instrument is printed save for the phrase “for aerial only,” which appears in handwriting near…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Pabst v. FinmandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Faulkner v. RondoniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Davis v. BrukSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Haley v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Jones Et Ux v. Edwards Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Western Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Sambo's of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Dunn v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.