Legal Opinion
Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. Krushnic
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 6, 1930No. 63PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
The disposition of this case depends upon the construction and application of § 2324, R. S. (U. S. C. Title 30, §28), and the effect- upon its provisions of § 37 of the Mineral Leasing Act of February 25, 1920, c. 85, 41 Stat. 437, 451 ,(U. S. C. Title 30, § 193). Section 2324, R. S., which has its origin in § 5 of the Mining Act of 1872 (c. 152, 17.Stat. 91, 92), provides:
“On each claim located after the tenth day of May, eighteen hundred and seventy-two, and until a patent has been issued therefor, not less than one hundred dollars’ worth of labor shall be performed or improvements made…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Payne v. Central Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Lane v. HoglundSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Manuel v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. Ray Shumway Molly ShumwayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- State of Washington v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Richard M. Nixon, Individually and as President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Miguel v. McCarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.