Legal Opinion

Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. Kadrie

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 14, 1930No. 77PublishedCited by 259 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus commanding the Secretary of the Interior to restore the relators to the supplemental rolls of the Chippewa Indians in Minnesota and to pay to each of them a per capita share of all future distributions, whether of interest or principal, made from the fund created under section 7 of the act of January 14, 1889, c. 24, 25 Stat. 642.

The writ was denied by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, but that ruling was reversed by the Court of Appeals, 30 Fed. (2d) 989, and the matter is here for review on certiorari.

When the act of 1889 was passed the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Work v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by259 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Mattz v. ArnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Thomas C. Smith, Appellant-Petitioner v. Stanley S. Resor, Secretary of the Army, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

254 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API