Lane v. Hoglund
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus against the Secretary of the Interior. In the court of first instance the writ was refused, but the Court of Appeals directed that it be granted, 44 App. D. C. 310, and our jurisdiction arises out of the fact that the construction of a statute of the United States and the duty of the Secretary of the Interior thereunder are drawn in question. The statute is the following provision in § 7 of. the Act of March 3, 1891, c. 561, 26 Stat. 1095, 1099:
“That after the lapse of two years from the date of the issuance of the receiver’s receipt upon the final…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Work v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Deering Milliken, Inc., a Corporation v. Reed Johnston, as Regional Director of the National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- State of Washington v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Richard M. Nixon, Individually and as President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.