Legal Opinion
Miguel v. McCarl
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 5, 1934No. 435PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
The petitioner served as an enlisted man in the Philippine Scouts under successive enlistments from October t; 1901;-untir0etober 31,1931, at which time, upon proper application, he was, by order of the Secretary of War acting for the President, placed on the retired list of the army with the rank of master sergeant in pursuance of the Act of March 2, 1907, c. 2515, 34 Stat. 1217, which provides:
“When an enlisted man shall have served thirty years either in the Army, Navy, or Marine Corps, or in all, he .shall, upon making application to the President, be placed upon the retired list, with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. Shreveport Grain & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Warner Valley Stock Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Idaho Watersheds Project v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Fallini v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Great American Indemnity Co. v. Gobierno de la CapitalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.