State of Washington v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ELY, Circuit Judge:
The State of Washington instituted this suit in an attempt to secure judicial review of an administrative determination by the Secretary of the Interior, acting through subordinate officials in the Bureau of Reclamation. The federal officials had determined that Washington was not entitled to the delivery of water from the Columbia Basin Project to more than 160 irrigable acres of certain state-owned lands within the South Columbia Basin Irrigation District. The District Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Dugan v. Rank, 372 U.S. 609, 83 S.Ct. 999, 10 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- Beller v. MiddendorfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- City of Santa Clara v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Mary L. Brandt and Natalie Z. Shell v. Walter J. Hickel, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Dotson v. GriesaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peabody Western Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.