Legal Opinion
Squire v. Cnty. of L. A.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided March 21, 2018No. B276887PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAshmann-Gerst, J.
*218*18Appellants Matthew Squire (Squire) and Ernesto Masson (Masson) (collectively appellants) appeal from the judgment denying their petition for writ of mandate. They contend the written reprimands they received from the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (Department) in September 2014, should be rescinded because they did not receive notice of proposed discipline within the one-year statute of limitations period in the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (POBRA) ( Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq. ). We disagree and affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
The May 2014 Reprimands
M…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Mays v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Franz v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Alameida v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Jackson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Daugherty v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bacilio v. City of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bacilio v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Botello v. NeuschmidDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Daugherty v. City & Co. of SFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.