Legal Opinion
Rando v. Harris
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 6, 2014No. B254060PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FERNS, J. *
Real party in interest Frank Quintero (Quintero) was appointed to fill a vacant position on the city council for real party in interest the city of Glendale (City). Petitioners and appellants John Rando and Mariano Rodas thereafter submitted an application for leave to sue in quo warranta to respondent Kamala Harris, the Attorney General for the State of California (Attorney General). They argued Quintero’s appointment violated the City charter. The Attorney General denied the application and the trial court denied appellants’ petition for writ of mandate challenging that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Lexin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- California Attorney General Opinion 23-901, California Attorney General Reports2024
- California Attorney General Opinion 22-802, California Attorney General Reports2024
- California Attorney General Opinion 24-1002, California Attorney General Reports2026
- California Attorney General Opinion 24-1002, California Attorney General Reports2026
- California Attorney General Opinion 24-701, California Attorney General Reports2024
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.