Legal Opinion
State v. Schneck
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided August 21, 2002No. 02-0513-FTPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETTESHEIM, PJ.
¶ 1. Casey J. Schneck challenges the trial court's ruling that the summary judgment procedure set out in Wis. Stat. § 802.08 (1999-2000) 1 is not permitted in a traffic forfeiture prosecution under Wis. Stat. ch. 345. We affirm the trial court's ruling.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2. The facts and procedural history of this case are brief and undisputed. Schneck was issued a uniform traffic citation for knowingly transporting alcohol in a motor vehicle as an underage person pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 346.93(1). The matter was prosecuted as a forfeiture action in the circuit…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Milwaukee v. WukyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Schaeve v. Van LareCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- JAMES SERVAIS v. Kraft Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. BaratkaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- State v. BauschCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
- Boyer, Christopher v. Zais, RandallDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.