Legal Opinion

State v. Bausch

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 19, 2013No. 2013AP752PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLundsten, J.

¶ 1. Anica Bausch appeals the circuit court's order concluding that she could not conduct pretrial discovery in this forfeiture action brought by the State under Wis. Stat. ch. 778.1 Chapter 778 describes procedures for actions to collect forfeitures in circuit court. See Wis. Stat. §§ 778.01 and 778.015; see also generally ch. 778. The sole issue is whether Wis. Stat. ch. 804 civil discovery procedures apply in an action to recover a forfeiture that is commenced by a citation under Wis. Stat. § 778.25. We hold that the test used to decide this particular statutory interpretation question…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Paige K. B. v. Steven G. B.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. County of Portage v. SteinpreisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Sands v. Whitnall School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Townes v. Virginia State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API