Legal Opinion

Boyer, Christopher v. Zais, Randall

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 5, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00401Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN CHRISTOPHER J. BOYER, Plaintiff, OPINION and ORDER v. 24-cv-401-jdp RANDALL ZAIS and WIS. STATE PATROL, Defendants. Plaintiff Christopher J. Boyer, proceeding without counsel, alleges that defendant Randall Zais, a Wisconsin state trooper, illegally seized him, used excessive force on him, and coerced him to talk against his will during a traffic stop. Even though Boyer paid the filing fee, I will screen the complaint to ensure that it states a claim for which this court may grant relief. Hoskins v. Poelstra,

320 F.3d…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. James Hoskins v. John PoelstraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API