Boyer, Christopher v. Zais, Randall
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN CHRISTOPHER J. BOYER, Plaintiff, OPINION and ORDER v. 24-cv-401-jdp RANDALL ZAIS and WIS. STATE PATROL, Defendants. Plaintiff Christopher J. Boyer, proceeding without counsel, alleges that defendant Randall Zais, a Wisconsin state trooper, illegally seized him, used excessive force on him, and coerced him to talk against his will during a traffic stop. Even though Boyer paid the filing fee, I will screen the complaint to ensure that it states a claim for which this court may grant relief. Hoskins v. Poelstra,
320 F.3d…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- James Hoskins v. John PoelstraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.