JAMES SERVAIS v. Kraft Foods, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.
¶ 1. The appellants' claims attack milk marketing orders that were established by a federal agency through formal rulemaking designed to implement a congressional scheme. Therefore, the orders determine lawful rates. Because the filed rate doctrine precludes suits for damages developed through attacks on such lawful rates, whether the claims for relief arise under state or federal law, we conclude that the filed rate doctrine bars the appellants' action. Additionally, because the appellants have made no showing of a method of damage calculation that would not be based on the difference…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Schmidt v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Carlin v. DairyAmerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In Re Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. Cheese Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Ice Cream Liquidation, Inc. v. Land O'Lakes, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- In Re Southeastern Milk Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.