Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 23, 1997No. 96-1211, 96-1393PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.

Richard Brown and Donald Williams appeal from trial court orders holding that there is no right to judicial substitution in Chapter 980 civil commitment proceedings. Brown and Williams argue that, under a proper interpretation of Chapter 980 and § 801.01(2), STATS., the right to judicial substitution afforded by § 801.58, Stats., does apply to Chapter 980 civil commitment proceedings. Alternatively, Brown and Williams argue that without a right to judicial substitution, Chapter 980 violates constitutional guarantees of equal protection. We conclude that Chapter 980, containing the civil…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. David S. v. Laura S.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. Serocki v. Circuit Court for Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. MorfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. ThielCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. State v. PharmCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. State v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Marberry v. MacHtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API