Legal Opinion

Eaid v. National Casualty Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1927PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

It is strenuously urged by defendant that tbe Court erred in allowing plaintiff to amend bis complaint. In tbe original pleadings tbe allegations of plaintiff, in regard to bis statements to tbe agent concerning bis occupation and allegations of waiver and estoppel, were contained in plaintiff’s reply but not in plaintiff’s complaint. After plaintiff’s testimony was introduced in tbe first instance and a motion for an involuntary nonsuit was interposed by defendant and denied by tbe court, tbe plaintiff was allowed to amend bis complaint by setting forth therein tbe matters contained in the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Brink v. . Hanover Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Knickerbocker Life Insurance v. PendletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Western & A. Pipe Lines v. Home Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1891

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Great American Insurance v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Higgins v. Insurance Company of North AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Cummings v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Comer v. World Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API