Coffman v. Coffman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
This appeal presents two questions for review: (1) whether the presumption of legitimacy of a child born during wedlock was overcome and (2) whether it was error to deny appellant’s motion for a new trial.
Pursuant to Rule 11(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, a narrative statement of evidence presented below has been substituted for a reporter’s transcript. The Coffmans were married in Germany in 1962 and the husband, as a member of the U.S. armed forces, served in various parts of the world from 1962 to 1975. They were living in Germany during the time a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Davis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Alber v. AlberIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Graham v. Vegetable Oil Products CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Gibbons v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Ventresco v. BusheySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Golonka v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- In Re the Marriage of SchnecklothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Holland v. HollandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Phaire v. PhaireSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1981
- Augustin v. AugustinSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.