Legal Opinion

Coffman v. Coffman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 23, 1979No. 2 CA-CIV 2996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This appeal presents two questions for review: (1) whether the presumption of legitimacy of a child born during wedlock was overcome and (2) whether it was error to deny appellant’s motion for a new trial.

Pursuant to Rule 11(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, a narrative statement of evidence presented below has been substituted for a reporter’s transcript. The Coffmans were married in Germany in 1962 and the husband, as a member of the U.S. armed forces, served in various parts of the world from 1962 to 1975. They were living in Germany during the time a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Alber v. AlberIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Graham v. Vegetable Oil Products CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Gibbons v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. Ventresco v. BusheySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Golonka v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. In Re the Marriage of SchnecklothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Holland v. HollandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Phaire v. PhaireSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1981
  5. Augustin v. AugustinSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API