Legal Opinion

Golonka v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 1, 2003No. 1 CA-CV 00-0467PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 The family of Ruth Golonka initiated this products liability case against General Motors Corporation (“GM”) after Mrs. Golonka was tragically killed when her idling GM truck shifted into reverse and struck her as she stood behind the truck. A jury found GM at fault for negligence and strict liability information defect, and awarded compensatory and punitive damages. GM appeals from the subsequent judgment, arguing that the court erred by denying GM’s motions for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial, and by making certain evidentiary rulings.

¶ 2 To…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. GMC v. Saenz on Behalf of SaenzTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Masaki v. General Motors Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Coffman v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Lisa Stilwell v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Rivera v. Philip Morris, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Palmer v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Powers v. Taser International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API