Legal Opinion

Graham v. Vegetable Oil Products Company

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 28, 1965No. 2 CA-CIV 36PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Appellants Graham and Thomasson respectively owned and operated a well-drilling business and an aerial application business. Appellee Jennings Cotton Co., hereinafter referred to as Jennings, was a corporation engaged in the business of crop financing and cotton ginning. Appellee Vegetable Oil Products Co., hereinafter referred to as Veg-Oil, was a corporation engaged in the business'of processing cotton seed. 'At the time this lawsuit arose, Jennings was operating under the name of Stanfield Y-D Gin, a corporation in which Veg-Oil, through a subsidiary, owned a substantial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Otero v. Soto Ex Rel. GonzalesArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Illinois Bankers' Life Assn. v. TheodoreArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Ratley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Martin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Reliable Electric Co. v. Clinton Campbell Contractor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. City of Tucson v. HollidayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Gallagher v. Viking Supply CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Loffa v. Intel Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API