In Re the Marriage of Schneckloth
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, Justice.
In this appeal and cross-appeal from a dissolution decree, we review de novo the sufficiency of evidence to establish respondent Michael Schneckloth’s paternity of a child born to petitioner Elizabeth Schneck-loth during the marriage. Because we find the evidence insufficient on the paternity issue, we reverse on Michael’s appeal. This moots Elizabeth’s cross-appeal from the child support award, and the cross-appeal is therefore dismissed.
The record shows that the trial court exercised its authority to appoint an attorney for the minor child pursuant to section 598.12, The…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Serafin v. SerafinMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Davis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Moore v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Goetzman v. WichernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- In the Interest of B.G.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Heather Martin Gartner and Melissa Gartner, Individually and as Next Friends of Mackenzie Jean Gartner, a Minor Child v. Iowa Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- In Re the Marriage of StogdillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- In the Interest of C.T.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.