Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Schneckloth

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 16, 1982No. 66107PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

In this appeal and cross-appeal from a dissolution decree, we review de novo the sufficiency of evidence to establish respondent Michael Schneckloth’s paternity of a child born to petitioner Elizabeth Schneck-loth during the marriage. Because we find the evidence insufficient on the paternity issue, we reverse on Michael’s appeal. This moots Elizabeth’s cross-appeal from the child support award, and the cross-appeal is therefore dismissed.

The record shows that the trial court exercised its authority to appoint an attorney for the minor child pursuant to section 598.12, The…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Serafin v. SerafinMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Davis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Moore v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1937

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Goetzman v. WichernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. In the Interest of B.G.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  3. Heather Martin Gartner and Melissa Gartner, Individually and as Next Friends of Mackenzie Jean Gartner, a Minor Child v. Iowa Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. In Re the Marriage of StogdillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. In the Interest of C.T.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API