Martin v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Thomas
Reversing.
The defendant, the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea. Company, operates a great number of retail grocery stores throughout the country, including this Commonwealth, one of which is located in Corbin, Kentuclcy-
On April 1, 1944, the appellant, A. L. Martin, as a customer of appellee’s retail store in Corbin, purchased from it a sealed package of “chili con carne”' to be consumed as food by himself and family. The-package was opened by plaintiff after his arrival at his home, and a part of its contents was consumed by his family, including himself.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Griggs Canning Co. v. JoseyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Swengel v. F. & E. Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Bonenberger v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Peaslee-Gaulbert Co. v. McMath's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Belknap Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Wiggins v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Sams v. Ezy-Way Foodliner Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
- Snead v. WaiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Nocera v. Great A. P. Tea CompanyConnecticut Superior Court · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.