Legal Opinion

Martin v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 25, 1946PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Reversing.

The defendant, the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea. Company, operates a great number of retail grocery stores throughout the country, including this Commonwealth, one of which is located in Corbin, Kentuclcy-

On April 1, 1944, the appellant, A. L. Martin, as a customer of appellee’s retail store in Corbin, purchased from it a sealed package of “chili con carne”' to be consumed as food by himself and family. The-package was opened by plaintiff after his arrival at his home, and a part of its contents was consumed by his family, including himself.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Griggs Canning Co. v. JoseyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Swengel v. F. & E. Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Bonenberger v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Peaslee-Gaulbert Co. v. McMath's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Belknap Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  2. Wiggins v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  3. Sams v. Ezy-Way Foodliner Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
  4. Snead v. WaiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  5. Nocera v. Great A. P. Tea CompanyConnecticut Superior Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API