Swengel v. F. & E. Wholesale Grocery Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
This was an action to recover for damages alleged to have been sustained from consumption of canned sauerkraut juice, and from an adverse judgment the defendant appeals.
*556Omitting allegations not material to the appeal, plaintiff alleged that defendant, a wholesale grocery company, had sold' certain Libby’s sauerkraut juice put up in cans, to Mabel McCully, who conducted a retail grocery store in Wichita, Kan., representing that the juice was fit for use and immediate human consumption; that plaintiff bought five cans of the juice from the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Tomlinson v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Parks v. C. C. Yost Pie Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Bigelow v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Leda Mae Symons v. Mueller CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Brooks v. DietzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Graham v. Bottenfield's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Griggs Canning Co. v. JoseyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.