Legal Opinion

Swengel v. F. & E. Wholesale Grocery Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1938No. 33,746PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to recover for damages alleged to have been sustained from consumption of canned sauerkraut juice, and from an adverse judgment the defendant appeals.

*556Omitting allegations not material to the appeal, plaintiff alleged that defendant, a wholesale grocery company, had sold' certain Libby’s sauerkraut juice put up in cans, to Mabel McCully, who conducted a retail grocery store in Wichita, Kan., representing that the juice was fit for use and immediate human consumption; that plaintiff bought five cans of the juice from the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Tomlinson v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  4. Parks v. C. C. Yost Pie Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Bigelow v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Leda Mae Symons v. Mueller CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. Brooks v. DietzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Graham v. Bottenfield's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Griggs Canning Co. v. JoseyTexas Supreme Court · 1942

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API