Legal Opinion

Griggs Canning Co. v. Josey

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1942No. 7733PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alexander

This case is before this Court on certified question. Norman Josey’s wife purchased a can of spinach from Jesus V. Ocon, a retail merchant. The label on the can plaintly showed the name and address of the manufacturer or processor. The spinach was unfit for human consumption. Josey’s wife and stepson became ill as a result of eating the spinach. Under the foregoing facts, the Court of Civil Appeals has certified to this Court the following question:

‘‘Was Ocon, the retail dealer, liable to Josey for selling his wife a can of unwholesome spinach, plainly labeled with the processor’s name and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Ward v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Pittsburg Coca-Cola Bottling Works of Pittsburg v. PonderTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Shamrock Fuel & Oil Sales Co. v. TunksTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Robert D. Putman v. Erie City Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  4. Ford Motor Company v. Marvin R. MathisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Ford Motor Company v. Russell & Smith Ford CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API