Legal Opinion

Snead v. Waite

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 13, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Clay, Commissioner

Affirming. .

This is an appeal from two judgments against appellants, operators of a barbecue pit, for damages alleged to have been caused by the consumption of tainted meat sold to appellees. The verdicts were for $1,500 and $500, respectively. Appellants’ principal grounds for reversal are: (1) They were entitled to a peremptory instruction and the verdicts were contrary to the evidence, and (2) appellants’ offered instructions should have been given.

Appellees introduced evidence to prove the following facts: On November 2, 1946, Mr. Waite, about…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. EisemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  2. Martin v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dealers Transport Co. v. Battery Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Belknap Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  3. Max Krumholz and Emil Moosmann v. James Beckham Goff and Mary Lois Goff, Max Krumholz and Emil Moosmann v. F. T. Cantrell and Mary CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  4. Williams v. O'Charley's, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. King v. Ohio Valley Terminix Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API