Legal Opinion

Bonenberger v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1942No. Appeal, 186PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Parker,

This is an action in assumpsit for breach of warranty on a sale of oysters in a sealed container by a retail dealer in foodstuffs. The court below gave binding instructions for defendant and the plaintiffs have appealed. We are of the opinion that, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the plaintiffs, the judgment should not have been entered.

Ida Bonenberger, the wife of Jacob Bonenberger, ordered from defendant by telephone a pint of canned oysters which were delivered at their home the following day. In preparing an oyster stew for the family, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Ebbert v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Hochgertel v. Canada Dry Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Loch Et Ux. v. Confair Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Zabner v. Howard Johnson's, IncorporatedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API