Sams v. Ezy-Way Foodliner Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, C. J.
This case is before us on exceptions to the direction of a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff seeks damages under Section 15 II of the Uniform Sales Act for breach of an implied warranty of merchantability of “hot dogs” purchased by him from the defendant. Taking the evidence with its inferences in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, we are of the opinion a jury could have found as follows:
The defendant operated a self-service supermarket in which the customers made their own selection of food products and paid for them at the check-out counter. The plaintiff purchased a plain…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Ward v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Bigelow v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Burke v. Hamilton Beach Division, Scovill Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- McNally v. Nicholson Manufacturing CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Hurd v. HurdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Wagner v. Mars, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Kobeckis v. BudzkoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.