Legal Opinion

Bank of Yolo v. Bank of Woodland

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1906No. Civ. No. 160PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, and from an order denying a new trial. E. E. Gaddis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $2,713.65 from the defendant Evans, and to have it adjudged that the other defendants had no claim to or interest in said sum. Evans deposited the money in court to abide the result of the controversy between the banks, and the action as to him was dismissed. The Bank of Woodland, in its answer, denied the averments of the complaint, and by way of cross-complaint set forth its right to the money, and Simpson answered denying generally the averments of both the complaint and cross-complaint. The court rendered judgment that the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Pierce v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Krasky v. WollpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. La Rue v. GroezingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. H. D. Roosen Co. v. Pacific Radio Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Baumgarten v. California Pacific Title & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Brownfield v. McFaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. United States v. SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API