La Rue v. Groezinger
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
This was an action for damages for the breach of a contract to buy grapes. The substance of the material portions of the contract was as follows: —
One Hopper agreed to sell all the grapes which he might raise during a period of ten years from the vines which were then growing, or which he might thereafter plant, in a certain vineyard. The grapes were to be “ sound,” and were to be gathered when they contained twenty-two per cent of saccharine matter, and to be delivered in boxes at the wine-cellar of the defendant,— the “ first crop” to be delivered separately from the “second crop ”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Boston Ice Co. v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Hall v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Lansden v. McCarthySupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Shultz & Co. v. Johnson's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1845
3Cited by44 opinions
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Farmland Irrigation Co. v. DopplmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Minnetonka Oil Co. v. Cleveland Vitrified Brick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Mueller v. Northwestern UniversityIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.