H. D. Roosen Co. v. Pacific Radio Publishing Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This case involves the question of the defendant’s liability under its written acceptance of an assignment made for a valuable consideration to plaintiff in the sum of $900, which had not been earned by the assignor at the time of defendant’s acceptance; it being contended by defendant that, at about the time of the acceptance, such circumstances arose that nothing was thereafter earned by the assignor, and that the assignment became ineffectual and defendant’s acceptance nugatory. Judgment went in favor of the defendant, and from that judgment plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.
There…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Raborg v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- Irwin's Bank v. Fletcher, Etc., Trust Co., Rec.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
- McCarthy v. Mt. Tecarte Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Rossini v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Jones v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re Marriage of ShoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- H. S. Mann Corp. v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Hawaii Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.