Legal Opinion

H. D. Roosen Co. v. Pacific Radio Publishing Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1932No. Docket No. 7525PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This case involves the question of the defendant’s liability under its written acceptance of an assignment made for a valuable consideration to plaintiff in the sum of $900, which had not been earned by the assignor at the time of defendant’s acceptance; it being contended by defendant that, at about the time of the acceptance, such circumstances arose that nothing was thereafter earned by the assignor, and that the assignment became ineffectual and defendant’s acceptance nugatory. Judgment went in favor of the defendant, and from that judgment plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

There…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Raborg v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  3. Irwin's Bank v. Fletcher, Etc., Trust Co., Rec.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. McCarthy v. Mt. Tecarte Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Rossini v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Jones v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. In Re Marriage of ShoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. H. S. Mann Corp. v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Hawaii Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API