Legal Opinion
Brownfield v. McFadden
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 27, 1937No. Civ. 1650PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
—This action was instituted to recover from a trust estate, of which E. T. McFadden is trustee, the sum of $18,000, besides interest, costs and attorneys’ fees. The plaintiff had judgment as prayed for and certain of the defendants have appealed. For a proper understanding of the reasons for the conclusions reached by us it is necessary to detail many of the involved facts disclosed by the record.
H. J. Brownfield has been and is the duly appointed, qualified and acting guardian of the person and estate of Robert Todd Brownfield, a minor. Between January 3, 1927, and March 30, 1931, Reeves…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- McConnell v. Bible InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Carrington v. SmithersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Bickerdike v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southern California Enterprises, Inc. v. D. N. & E. Walter & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Booth v. BondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. Bell View Oil SyndicateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Hayman v. ShoemakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Sandrini v. BranchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.