Legal Opinion

Coffer v. Arndt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 2000No. 49A02-9910-CV-720PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOK, Judge

Case Summary

Appellant-plaintiff Robert Coffer (“Coffer”) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee-defen-dant George Arndt, Jr., O.D. (“Arndt”). We affirm. 1

Issues

Coffer presents two 2 issues, which we restate as follows:

I. whether the trial judge properly determined that the two-year statute of limitation barred Coffer’s action; and,

II. whether the trial court properly struck the second affidavit of a witness.

Facts and Procedural History

Arndt, an optometrist, performed periodic routine eye examinations on Coffer from 1975 through 1995. Arndt…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gaboury v. Ireland Road Grace Brethren, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kahf v. Charleston South ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Garneau v. BushIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Hopster v. BurgesonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Palmer v. GoreckiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Burns v. HatchettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. GYN-OB Consultants, L.L.C. v. SchoppIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API