Legal Opinion
Hopster v. Burgeson
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 21, 2001No. 19A01-0008-CV-291PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiff-Appellant, - Donald - Hopster (Donald), Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Patricia H. Hopster, appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendants-Appellees, Mary Burgeson, M.D. (Burgeson), Thomas Gootee, M.D. (Goo-tee), - Timothy H. McClure, MD. (MeClure), Craig Watts, M.D. (Watts), and Stephen I. DeWitt, D.O0. (DeWitt) (jointly referred to as the "Defendants").
We affirm in part, and reverse and remand in part. 1
ISSUES
Donald raises four issues on appeal, which we reorganize and restate as…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Cahoon v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Montgomery v. CrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
- Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Garneau v. BushIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Duncan v. DuncanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Ronald Warrum, in His Capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph F. Sayyah, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Ellenwine v. FairleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Jacobs v. ManhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.