Legal Opinion
Burns v. Hatchett
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 24, 2003No. 82A05-0212-CV-576PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Debra and Roger Burns (collectively "the Burnses") appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Robert K. Hatchett, D.M.D. on their medical malpractice claim. The Burnses present four issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as:
1. Whether the trial court erred when it found that the Burnses' claim was barred by the statute of limitations.
2. Whether the trial court erred when it rejected the Burnses' claim that the doctrine of fraudulent concealment precludes summary judgment in favor of Dr. Hatchett.
We affirm.
FACTS AND…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Paramo v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Zawistoski v. Gene B. Glick Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Perryman v. Motorist Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Moyer v. Three Unnamed Physicians From Marion County & Delaware CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Caito Foods v. KeyesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Daimler Chrysler Corp. v. Graves Sheet MetalIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Betty J. Rumell, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Margo Sue Rumell v. Osolo Emergency Medical Services, Inc., Todd Byrket, Julie Calloway, and Kim BryanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.