Treber v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.
This is a proceeding for writ of mandate to compel respondent court to set aside and vacate its order granting a new trial. The ease is a companion to Mercer v. Perez, ante, p. 104 [65 Cal.Rptr. 315, 436 P.2d 315], also filed this day. As will appear, we have concluded that petitioner is not entitled to relief by way of extraordinary writ.
Petitioner is the plaintiff in a damge action filed in respondent court against the real party in interest. On January 18, 1967, the jury in that action returned a verdict in favor of petitioner; counsel for petitioner fails to so advise us, but we presume…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Whitley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.