Legal Opinion

Treber v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1968No. S. F. 22540PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

This is a proceeding for writ of mandate to compel respondent court to set aside and vacate its order granting a new trial. The ease is a companion to Mercer v. Perez, ante, p. 104 [65 Cal.Rptr. 315, 436 P.2d 315], also filed this day. As will appear, we have concluded that petitioner is not entitled to relief by way of extraordinary writ.

Petitioner is the plaintiff in a damge action filed in respondent court against the real party in interest. On January 18, 1967, the jury in that action returned a verdict in favor of petitioner; counsel for petitioner fails to so advise us, but we presume…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Whitley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API